In our experience, simple numbers or statistics are some of the most effective ways for attorneys to make key points. But too often, lawyers use figures that force jurors to crunch the numbers and the point quickly loses impact.
For example, we work on a lot of medical malpractice cases involving premature babies. The way that doctors talk about gestation – 13 weeks, 25 weeks, 37 weeks – doesn’t make sense to the average juror unless they’re a recent parent. After conducting nationwide focus groups, we've learned that most jurors don’t even know that a full-term pregnancy is 37 weeks.
Therefore, we encourage attorneys to talk in terms in months. A baby born "three months early," as in a recent trial we monitored, paints a much clearer picture than one born at "28 weeks."
The same goes for a baby's weight. Premature babies are often categorized in grams, but most jurors hearing arguments on the fly don't have conversion calculators handy to decipher what "34 ounces" signifies. Don’t talk metrics – use the measurements people are most familiar with and describe a baby born at "two pounds, two ounces." The image is immediately clear: this is one tiny baby.
We recently monitored a trial about a baby exactly like this, born three months early and weighing two pounds, two ounces. When we interviewed jurors after the defense verdict was rendered, they said the main determinant in finding no causation (or negligence, for that matter) was that this baby was born so early, weighing so little, citing the "two pounds, two ounces" figure.
Our recommendation: Do the math for your jurors. A little conversion goes a long way when it comes to making a salient point.
-Claire Luna, Jury Impact Senior Analyst
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment