We’ve written before about jurors’
tendency to invent and embrace conspiracy theories during the course of a
lawsuit, and those of our readers who have done focus groups with us have
likely seen that dynamic in action.
It turns about that tendency –
particularly as it relates to medical conspiracy theories – is even more
pronounced than we thought. A new
study by a University of Chicago political
scientist published in March in the journal JAMA
Internal Medicine found that
half of Americans – and likely half of your jury panel – believe at least one
popular medical conspiracy theory.
Among the highlights, the study found
more than one-third of respondents believe the FDA is keeping natural cancer
cures off the market because of pressure from drug companies, 20 percent think
cellphones cause cancer but the government is ignoring it to appease
corporations, and 20 percent believe doctors and the government know vaccines cause autism but continue
using them anyway.
It takes no great leap of imagination
to conclude jurors holding these views might be quicker to assume doctors,
hospitals or corporations being sued would engage in a cover-up. The challenge, of course, is to identify
these potential jurors during voir dire – before
they have a chance to poison your jury.
The study found people who embraced
conspiracy theories tended to be less educated, poorer and members of minority
groups. But a deeper look reveals some
interesting trends that could give you a leg up during voir dire.
For example, conspiracy theorists were
less likely to use a primary care doctor for medical advice and instead relied
on the Internet and celebrity doctors such as Dr. Mehmet Oz. In fact, more than 80 percent of people who look
to celebrity doctors for medical advice believed at least one of the conspiracy
theories. Conspiracy believers were also
more likely to buy organic foods, take herbal supplements and avoid
vaccines.
Interestingly, political liberals and
conservatives embraced conspiracies in almost equal numbers (with conservatives
being slightly more conspiracy-minded), so don’t rely on political ideology
alone during jury selection.
What ties this all together is a deep
distrust of institutions and authority, whether it be government or the health
care industry. From our perspective,
these are the types of issues you should probe during voir dire: Do you think
hospitals put profits before people? Do
you trust your doctor to give you unbiased advice, or do you look for advice
elsewhere? Do you think vaccines cause
autism or cell phones cause cancer?
If you have a case where conspiracy
might rear its head, it might be worth it to see how this plays out in focus
groups. Contact Senior Vice President
Claire Luna at cluna@juryimpact.net
or 714-754-1010 to find out how we can help.
No comments:
Post a Comment